IndexGuard: Quality-Filtered Programmatic SEO Engine for Public Record Aggregators

It's been a while, but I've been working on something!

the reply above covers the mechanics well so i wont repeat it, but i think theres a bigger thing sitting under your question that changes the plan. you already answered it yourself and moved past it. 350k indexed out of 90m, on a site with 33k backlinks. thats not a bad result, thats google telling you clearly what it will accept from a template. the thing people get wrong about pages at this scale is assuming indexing is the constraint. it isnt. google will happily crawl millions of your pages and then keep almost none of them, because it decides per template whether the page adds anything that isnt already on the internet. so 2 billion possible reports is a number about your database, not about your website, and if you treat it as a page target youll spend a year building infrastructure for pages that will never be kept. the part id worry about more than any of this. people search and public records is the most policy exposed category in search, full stop. google has explicit policy language now about scaled content abuse, which is basically generating a large number of pages that exist mainly to catch search traffic without offering much of a reason to exist, and this category is the textbook example of it. it is not a theoretical risk, sites in this exact niche get wiped periodically. theres a thread on r/SEO today from someone who shipped 4500 templated pages in one deploy and went to flat zero in search console for a month afterward. so the thing that kills you probably wont be a technical indexing issue, itll be a judgement call about whether your template deserves to exist, and that judgement gets made once and applies to everything. which is why id design the page around the one thing a data reseller can have that a competitor cant copy. everyone in your space has broadly the same underlying records. if your page is the same fields in a different font, theres no argument for keeping it. the defensible version is usually explanation rather than data. what this record actually means, where it came from, how current it is, what someone should do next, written properly per record type rather than spun per record. thats also the bit that earns the links youre asking about, because nobody links to a lookup page and people do link to a page that explains how to read a court record. on rollout, id do it as a small number of templates rather than a page count. pick one record type, ship a few thousand, and then watch four separate things which the other reply was right to separate. did google crawl it, did it index it, did it rank, did the traffic convert. those fail at different stages for different reasons and if you only look at total indexed pages youll be flying blind. if a template survives all four, scale that one template hard. if it doesnt, you just saved yourself from doing it two billion times. on backlinks, id skip the in-article card idea. thats a link building tactic dressed as a product and google has been discounting that pattern for years. for a data business the thing that actually works is releasing a free slice of the data as a genuinely useful public tool or a piece of research nobody else can publish, because you own something they dont. thats also the only kind of link that helps a site in a category that gets viewed with suspicion by default. last thing, and its the one id sort before any of it. check the legal side of the B2C offering properly, because in the US selling reports about people bumps into FCRA rules depending on how theyre used, and thats a compliance question that decides your product design, not something to retrofit. im not a lawyer, but every serious operator in this space has that conversation early.

the reply above covers the mechanics well so i wont repeat it, but i think theres a bigger thing sitting under your question that changes the plan. you already answered it yourself and moved past it. 350k indexed out of 90m, on a site with 33k backlinks. thats not a bad result, thats google telling you clearly what it will accept from a template. the thing people get wrong about pages at this scale is assuming indexing is the constraint. it isnt. google will happily crawl millions of your pages and then keep almost none of them, because it decides per template whether the page adds anything that isnt already on the internet. so 2 billion possible reports is a number about your database, not about your website, and if you treat it as a page target youll spend a year building infrastructure for pages that will never be kept. the part id worry about more than any of this. people search and public records is the most policy exposed category in search, full stop. google has explicit policy language now about scaled content abuse, which is basically generating a large number of pages that exist mainly to catch search traffic without offering much of a reason to exist, and this category is the textbook example of it. it is not a theoretical risk, sites in this exact niche get wiped periodically. theres a thread on r/SEO today from someone who shipped 4500 templated pages in one deploy and went to flat zero in search console for a month afterward. so the thing that kills you probably wont be a technical indexing issue, itll be a judgement call about whether your template deserves to exist, and that judgement gets made once and applies to everything. which is why id design the page around the one thing a data reseller can have that a competitor cant copy. everyone in your space has broadly the same underlying records. if your page is the same fields in a different font, theres no argument for keeping it. the defensible version is usually explanation rather than data. what this record actually means, where it came from, how current it is, what someone should do next, written properly per record type rather than spun per record. thats also the bit that earns the links youre asking about, because nobody links to a lookup page and people do link to a page that explains how to read a court record. on rollout, id do it as a small number of templates rather than a page count. pick one record type, ship a few thousand, and then watch four separate things which the other reply was right to separate. did google crawl it, did it index it, did it rank, did the traffic convert. those fail at different stages for different reasons and if you only look at total indexed pages youll be flying blind. if a template survives all four, scale that one template hard. if it doesnt, you just saved yourself from doing it two billion times. on backlinks, id skip the in-article card idea. thats a link building tactic dressed as a product and google has been discounting that pattern for years. for a data business the thing that actually works is releasing a free slice of the data as a genuinely useful public tool or a piece of research nobody else can publish, because you own something they dont. thats also the only kind of link that helps a site in a category that gets viewed with suspicion by default. last thing, and its the one id sort before any of it. check the legal side of the B2C offering properly, because in the US selling reports about people bumps into FCRA rules depending on how theyre used, and thats a compliance question that decides your product design, not something to retrofit. im not a lawyer, but every serious operator in this space has that conversation early.