StrawDrop: Eyedropper Restore for Strawpage Drawing
Strawpage drawing interface lacks an eyedropper tool after previously removing it along with preset palettes, forcing imprecise color selection from canvas or elements.
Is the problem real?
Strawpage drawing interface lacks an eyedropper tool for color selection.
EVIDENCE
Strawpage USED to have a color selection similar to Apple Notes where you had preset palettes and an eye dropper but they changed it for some reason??? and now it sucks 🥺
commentStrawpage USED to have a color selection similar to Apple Notes where you had preset palettes and an eye dropper but they changed it for some reason??? and now it sucks 🥹
ARE YOU SERIOUS 🤬🤬😭😭💔💔
commentARE YOU SERIOUS 🤬🤬😭😭💔💔
Who feels this pain?
TARGET USERS
Casual creators who use Strawpage's drawing feature for fun or quick visual pages and struggle with imprecise color selection.
Context
Current Workarounds
Where's the gap?
EXISTING SOLUTION GAPS
OPPORTUNITY & VALUE
Multiple direct quotes and one highly upvoted post specifically requesting eyedropper restoration.
Seamless injection specifically for Strawpage's removed features, unlike generic color tools that require app switching.
Lightweight Chrome extension that injects a precise eyedropper tool and restored palette directly into Strawpage's drawing canvas.
How does it make money?
MONETIZATION
Model
Multiple users express strong frustration and nostalgia for the old eyedropper/palette system with crying emojis and high upvotes; they already used the feature before removal and want it back enough to complain publicly.
How do you ship it?
MVP PLAN
“Instant color picking while drawing on Strawpage.”
Lightweight Chrome extension that injects a precise eyedropper tool and restored palette directly into Strawpage's drawing canvas.
Core Features
Weekly Roadmap
- •Build Chrome manifest and content script
- •Implement canvas color sampling logic
- •Inject eyedropper UI element
- •Add preset palettes from old Apple Notes style
- •Color history storage
- •Brush color application binding
- •Test on multiple Strawpage drawing sessions
- •Handle dynamic canvas updates
- •Polish UI to match Strawpage style
- •Publish to Chrome Web Store
- •Post in relevant communities with demo
- •Setup basic analytics for usage
Launch on r/Strawpage or similar communities, X posts targeting Strawpage users, and Product Hunt as a companion tool.
RISKS & ASSUMPTIONS
Top Risks
Strawpage updates to their drawing canvas could break the injection, requiring constant maintenance.
Drawing appears to be a secondary feature on Strawpage, limiting total potential users.
Strawpage may view the extension as competitive and take action against it or reimplement the feature.
Users must install extension rather than native fix.
Should you build it?
Run an Investment Memo to get a structured Go / No-Go verdict, competitor landscape, unit economics, and a 90-day validation roadmap for this opportunity.
Generate an investment memoWhat this score means
This idea scores in the upper-middle range of opportunities surfaced by MonetScope, with a validation sub-score of 7/10 against 3 independently sourced evidence signals. A "promising" rating usually indicates a real pain has been detected and discussed in the open, but the pipeline did not find enough signal to flag it as urgent or high-frequency. These opportunities can still produce excellent businesses — they often correspond to "boring" problems that established players have ignored — but the founder should expect a longer customer-development cycle to confirm willingness to pay.
Why this matters for Other founders
It sits at the intersection of "browser-extension", "casual-users", "creators", which makes it relevant to a specific subset of founders rather than a generic horizontal opportunity. Opportunities in this category typically reward founders who can describe the pain in the user's own language — both because that's the basis of effective marketing, and because it's the strongest signal that the founder has done the upfront listening. The MonetScope pipeline surfaces this category alongside other other signals, which is why it appears here rather than in a generic "trending ideas" feed.
Scores are derived from real forum discussions across Reddit, Hacker News and X, weighted by evidence volume and signal quality. How scoring works
Frequently asked questions
Is "StrawDrop: Eyedropper Restore for Strawpage Drawing" a real validated startup idea or just an AI-generated suggestion?
MonetScope does not generate ideas from a language model's imagination. Every opportunity on this site is anchored to specific source posts and comments from real public discussions — typically on Reddit, Hacker News, or X — where actual users describe the pain in their own words. The AI's role is structuring, scoring, and grouping those signals into a navigable opportunity, not inventing the problem.
How recent is the underlying data for browser-extension?
MonetScope's spider pipeline runs continuously and surfaces opportunities as new evidence accumulates. The "Updated" date in the header reflects the most recent re-scoring of this specific opportunity. Most other opportunities visible in the public catalog draw from discussions in the last 30-60 days; older signals are de-prioritized because user pain shifts faster than most founders assume.
What's the difference between "overall score" and "validation score"?
Overall score is a composite across six dimensions — pain, urgency, willingness to pay, market size, defensibility, and execution ease — designed to give a single number for triage. Validation score is narrower: it asks "how cleanly does the same signal repeat across independent sources?" An opportunity can score high on overall but lower on validation when one or two large discussions dominate the evidence; conversely, validation can be high on a smaller-overall idea where the signal is consistent but the addressable market is modest.